Intolerance, lack of respect encourage double standard
I was shocked, saddened and, initially at least, more than a little angry over an encounter I had on Facebook in the middle of last week when I publicly shared a link to a story about an ACLU report critical of what it called the militarization of our police forces.
The encounter also left me asking: When did it ever become
OK to refer to people as “white trash?” It is racist and reminiscent of the
equally reprehensive term “trailer trash.” Ultimately, both terms are
expressions of disdain or hatred based on economic status — in other words, they
are class-based slurs. How can these kinds of terms be any less hateful than other
racial or ethnic epithets?
As a nation, we have worked for such a long time, sometimes futilely,
it seems, to eliminate such epithets from our lexicon. Yet, we seem to have
little trouble finding substitute targets and slurs.
I believe I probably lost this Facebook “friend” on Wednesday
for two reasons:
- One, I called his use of the term “white trash” racist and said that I would not tolerate it.
- Two, he became angry with me because we differ on a political issue — gun control — and perhaps others as well. Because I support gun rights, he decided to attack me personally, saying, “you’re just part of the problem, aren’t you?”
I would point out that while I support gun rights, I do not
hold to the no-compromise positions the NRA seems to advance.
Moments later, I realized he had unfriended me, which was
his right.
It seems to me, however, that the situation reflects a greater,
dual problem in America today: Bigotry, which is a narrow-mindedness that is
intolerant of other viewpoints, long has been the norm in Washington politics,
where it is politely called partisanship. It endures in plain sight among both
Democrats and Republicans, and it gives rise to an us-versus-them mentality that
clearly places party priorities above those of voters.
And it appears to be spreading, giving rise to a far too-prevalent
double standard in our purportedly free society. It says, “I have a right to my
beliefs … but you do not.”
Rarely is it said so plainly, but the attitude and animosity
are clear. Actions, after all, speak louder than words. When discussion
devolves into personal attacks, ridicule, cursing, hateful words, and intimidation,
then reason has departed and with it, respect. What remains does nothing to
advance the discussion and in fact serves only to build greater enmity.
This is most plainly visible in Internet threads, where
people add their comments to articles, blogs and similar posts. Often, what
begin as intelligent, thoughtful discussions devolve into profane, hateful
diatribes.
At its core is a lack of respect — whether for the
individual or for the group. Unless we restore that respect — in other words,
until each of us starts giving respect freely to others — I fear the growing
vitriol I see will bubble over more and more, perhaps even violently.
America, renowned as the melting pot where cultures came
together to forge a newer, stronger culture, is failing. I believe that
restoring respect can reverse that.
Finally, one of the great ironies in a situation where a
personal, or ad hominem attack is
made is that it often serves as an admission that “I have run out of good
arguments to prove my point and to discredit yours.”
So remember that the next time you hear a Republican call a
Democratic proposal “socialist,” or the next time you hear a Democrat call an
ultra-right Republican a “tea bagger” or obstructionist.
Chances are, they simply have run out of intelligent things
to say.
No comments:
Post a Comment